Laws & Policy
FTC inquiry into AI companion chatbots
A Federal Trade Commission study, using Section 6(b) orders, of consumer AI chatbots that act as companions and how they affect children and teens.
As of September 26, 2026, this is an FTC study, not a published set of findings. The Commission has not said, in the sources below, that it concluded any company broke the law.
- Policymakers and staff
- Parents
- Businesses
This is general information, not legal advice.
What parents should know
On September 11, 2025, the FTC ordered seven companies to answer questions about AI chatbots that act as companions, with a focus on children and teens. An order to send information is not a verdict. This page does not say the FTC concluded anything.
On this page
What is the FTC inquiry into AI companion chatbots?
The FTC used its Section 6(b) authority, which lets the Commission study an industry without opening a specific law-enforcement case. The September 11, 2025 press release says the orders went to seven companies that provide consumer-facing AI chatbots: Alphabet, Character Technologies, Instagram, Meta Platforms, OpenAI, Snap, and xAI. The Commission voted 3-0 to issue them. The study asks how companies measure and monitor negative effects on children and teens, how they limit use by young people, how they tell users and parents about risks, and how they handle the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.
A 6(b) study collects documents and answers. It is not a complaint, and it is not a published report of findings unless the FTC later releases one. As of September 26, 2026, the sources on this page are the launch announcement and the order materials, not a conclusion. Do not write FTC concluded.
Why the FTC inquiry into AI companion chatbots matters
Parents searching a brand name will find this inquiry next to the product. The fair reading is that the federal consumer agency is asking how companion-style chatbots affect minors. It is not a finding that a named company harmed a child, and it is not a finding that the category is safe.
Georgia's SB 540 and New York's companion rules are state statutes. This inquiry is federal process. They can be true at the same time. None of them is a substitute for reading the chat your own child is in.
These state laws are not copies of each other. A duty in Georgia may be missing in Tennessee, and a date in one state is not a date in the next. Whether Congress will override some of them is a live debate, described on the federal AI preemption page. Until a federal statute actually does that, read the state text that applies to you.
How it shows up in practice
- A news story says the FTC is investigating companions. The press release calls it a study.
- A slide says the FTC found a company liable. That sentence is not supported by the September 2025 announcement.
- A parent uses the company list to know which household apps were asked for information.
- A state law page and this inquiry page stay separate.
How HeyOtto helps
The FTC inquiry is a study of companion-style chatbots, not a set of findings. HeyOtto was not on the September 11, 2025 order list, and that absence is not a certification. A parent can read the chats. HeyOtto is not built as an ongoing emotional companion product. Distress brings crisis resources in the chat and an alert to the parent.
- Parents can read chats in the parent dashboard.
- Distress produces an alert and crisis resources, not an automatic call to emergency services.
- HeyOtto does not claim this statute is already satisfied.
For families
Try freeFAQs
Did the FTC conclude that companion chatbots harm teens?
No. As of September 26, 2026, the public record cited here is a study launched with 6(b) orders. The press release does not announce findings or a law-enforcement complaint.
Which companies received orders?
The FTC named Alphabet, Character Technologies, Instagram, Meta Platforms, OpenAI, Snap, and xAI.
Is this the same as Georgia's chatbot law?
No. Georgia SB 540 is a state statute that takes effect July 1, 2027. This entry is a federal study that started in September 2025. See both pages.
Sources
Last reviewed September 26, 2026. Law entries are reviewed every quarter.
This is general information, not legal advice.
